<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everyone is a publisher. So, what&#8217;s the problem?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hypernarrative.com/wordpress/2007/12/29/everyone-is-a-publisher-so-whats-the-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hypernarrative.com/wordpress/2007/12/29/everyone-is-a-publisher-so-whats-the-problem/</link>
	<description>About Art, Media and Technology and the future of it</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Inge</title>
		<link>http://www.hypernarrative.com/wordpress/2007/12/29/everyone-is-a-publisher-so-whats-the-problem/#comment-113183</link>
		<dc:creator>Inge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypernarrative.com/wordpress/2007/12/29/everyone-is-a-publisher-so-whats-the-problem/#comment-113183</guid>
		<description>I personally also opt for better filters, not less content. Music has the same 'problem': since software can replace hardware, everyone can (and often is) a producer of electronic music. In the past, anything that was released was 'good', since it already passed the filters of a record company and investments in a studio. That meant that I could safely buy any drum 'n bass album I found, since it was deemed to be good. 

Nowadays, anything can be published by anyone. Picking up everything from a genre I like is not a safe way. I therefore use filters (music mags, weblogs, friends) to filter out the quality content. I think that via this way the average quality of music (and its level of progress) has increased. It only takes a bit more time to find the proper content.

Ps: http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/28/social_media_blog_problems/ has 3 additional points regarding problems of social media / the fact that everyone can publish everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally also opt for better filters, not less content. Music has the same &#8216;problem&#8217;: since software can replace hardware, everyone can (and often is) a producer of electronic music. In the past, anything that was released was &#8216;good&#8217;, since it already passed the filters of a record company and investments in a studio. That meant that I could safely buy any drum &#8216;n bass album I found, since it was deemed to be good. </p>
<p>Nowadays, anything can be published by anyone. Picking up everything from a genre I like is not a safe way. I therefore use filters (music mags, weblogs, friends) to filter out the quality content. I think that via this way the average quality of music (and its level of progress) has increased. It only takes a bit more time to find the proper content.</p>
<p>Ps: <a href="http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/28/social_media_blog_problems/" rel="nofollow">http://www.grokdotcom.com/2007/12/28/social_media_blog_problems/</a> has 3 additional points regarding problems of social media / the fact that everyone can publish everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
