WilbertWelcome on my blog, it's my personal space about things I like, projects I do and thoughts I share. Feel free to comment, I enjoy reading your ideas and opinion.

You can also find me blogging at the electronic music blog eclectro.nl and journalism blog onlinejournalismblog.com.

Wilbert (more & contact)

Recent Comments

Wilbert Rumors of a $ 129,- a year flat fee iTunes subscription mode...
klaus that`s cool. i also did some experiments and tried to add so...
Renier I did not discover this option before either, thanks for poi...
Wilbert There is some difference. Last.fm can tell you about old mus...
Inge Janse Interesting. Last.fm for news. Not sure if it works (does on...
Wilbert Thanks. After a few days of using the beta version of th...
Arne Interesting stuff Wilbert!...

Desktop backgrounds

Playing with my camera I made some high resolution photo backgrounds, feel free to download them at Flickr.

Content is now and forever free

Accessibility, Journalism - Wilbert on September 19, 2007 at 10:30 pm,

Hi, hypernarrative is a blog by Wilbert Baan about Art, Media and Technology with a focus on interactive storytelling. If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed with Google or Netvibes. I'll post a few messages a week. Thanks for visiting!

Jeff Jarvis wrote a very thoughtful analysis of the New York Times decision to close the subscription based service Times Select. Content is now and forever free. I think Jeff is right. Although Times Select had payed subscribers the revenues on an online subscription based model are meager compared to the revenues of the same content on an advertisers base.

…Thus they made the good college try to prove whether or not a pay news service could work without harming the ad revenue of the business. Even so, TimesSelect hurt the larger brand and its position in the marketplace, in the conversation, and in Google. It was a short-sighted strategy…

And this has all to do with time we can spend on content and the presence of content in general. When content was expensive to distribute and not within infinite reach we had more content than we had time to spend. We could read a newspaper and take an hour to finish it. Focus on content - and thus available time to spend on not directly relevant information - has diverged in the last ten years. That’s why online search is such a major market, we want relevance.

Right now your attention, or some of your valuable time is worth more for an advertiser than you would be willing to pay for the content itself. And I agree with Jarvis, I don’t think this will ever change again. Time is money, personal or business.

Listen to, Andy Rosenthal, the editorial page editor, and his colleagues discuss the end of TimesSelect. Hosted by David Shipley, deputy editorial page editor and Op-Ed editor.
[audio:http://graphics8.nytimes.com/podcasts/2007/09/18/19oped-01.mp3]

What are your ideas about this?

Thanks for reading, you might also like

0 Comments

No comments yet.

TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

« Back to text comment

It can take a while for your comment to show up because of anti-spam checking. Don't worry, if you are not a spambot it will show up.

subscribe to rss feed RSS feed for comments on this post.

See all tags used on hypernarrative.com